“To empower” is by definition to give differential treatment. If you give everyone the same “differential treatment” then it’s not differential, is it, it’s simply equality. Let’s cut through the nonsense. There is a movement that never requested actions that are equal, it only demanded preferential treatment. People told that movement, “that’s asking for privilege for some, and discrimination for others”, to which that movement methodically replied, “this only balances” and listed alleged invisible discrepancies that would make such privileges “just balancing”. This preferential treatment was therefore dubbed by that movement, “empowerment”, to insinuate that it is performed on a backdrop of “a weakening” and therefore is not privilege, but an act of balancing. They could never show the alleged transparent discrepancies, so they used violent shaming tactics to force society to grant privileges to them and to the half of humanity that they treat as “their group” in their racist-like “theory of groups”, a.k.a., identity politics. The result shows how deep their lies were. Instead of a balance, a growing part of half of society is under oppression, deprivation, discrimination, and a growing part of the other half is born into systemic privilege.
Because when that movement started asking for privileges for itself and for discrimination for half of humanity, around the very early 1990s, there was already a balance. But that movement could never utter the words, “we got what we wanted, there’s no need for us anymore, we are dismantling our movement”. Instead they continued, by looking for discrepancies where there weren’t any, which was done through redefining the movement’s new terms when things those words were used for, could not be found in society. For example, they were not able to say “if there used to be such a thing as racism of men against women – which we called ‘sexism’ – now it doesn’t exist”, so instead they redefined sexism, to apply it to regular reality, to have “something to point at”, by that justifying their continuation. People around them tried everything in their power to open their eyes, so they would see that now they are asking for privilege for themselves and for discrimination for others, but for more than three decades, since the beginning of the 1990s, they could not open their eyes, and they created this way one of the ugliest chauvinisms on record, a systemic and institutional female anti-male chauvinism.
With that privilege in hand, they never created anything resembling equality. They used it to deepen more and more their chauvinism (female anti-male chauvinism), until today in any domain they reached full control over, men are not allowed in, there are almost no male novelists, there are nearly no male psychologists, male news anchors are a rarity, and the list goes on. And they continued from there to using that privilege and the unbalanced power they perused with it, for constructing around themselves absolute power – everywhere, in the law, in university, science, psychology, cinema, television, literature, any form of art, the court, in industries – as in an ordinary dictatorship. They used their power to suppress the oppressed from speaking out – they suppressed them in the media, in the news, in culture, in academia, labeling the oppressed as being “against women” for saying what was done to them by the powerful position-holders coming from that movement and in the name of that movement.
There is probably no going back. This will continue until the half of society that is under the violent occupation of that movement (what used to be the liberal part, now holding racist-like beliefs and supporting deep discrimination after being forced to accept the new racist theory-of-groups called identity politics, created by that movement through the extension of its division of humanity according traits – from division by sex, to division by race, to division by sexual preferences etc., basically to become more than 50% to take over democracy) – it will continue until that half will cease entirely to form relations between the sexes and to have children, after this movement banned the normal communication between the sexes in every conceivable space, from work, through university, public places, and clubs (“taking the night back”), by calling it “violence” (laboring to stack evidence for their theory that the differences between the sexes all come from violence of males against females, but never finding enough violence to support such a theory, they redefined normal human behavior like flirting, as violence, to accumulate “statistics” for the theory). That part of society can’t form relationships also because that movement legitimized for the members of “the group” to be abusive and violent, when reaching the supremacist belief that “the group” can only be benevolent, so whatever members do it is by definition justified and acceptable (searching for universal male violence required believing that “all and only males are responsible for all harm in humanity”, leaving the movement with the belief that females can only be benevolent, which led to legitimizing any level of abuse and violence if it is of females – hitting, coercing sex, emotional abuse, cheating, lying, hurting children – “if a female did it, it must be good and justified, since females are incapable of harm, because we know a mantra that we have for supporting our theory that all sex-differences are the result of male violence – ‘all and only males are responsible for all harm in humanity'”). This will continue until this lonely, sad, dysfunctional, discriminating, equality-phobic, anti-meritocratic, incompetent, error-praising, mediocrity-admiring, oppressive, abusive, hateful part of society, reaches zero reproduction because no sexual communication is allowed for the only sex who is biologically wired to be the initiator – males – and abuse is protected for females. Consequently, that part of society is about to self-annihilate.
There is no movement of tens of millions of members of the oppressive group against the movement and what it did, there will never be one. They are too tempted by the idea that privilege awaits if they cooperate (some are in such deep collective amnesia – caused by intense levels of denial and lies – that they already forgot they were helping with a lie, and authentically believe that in the West they are “the weakened”); while, when each of them realizes that only eternal loneliness is waiting for them, they blame the oppressed (as they were taught to do by the movement), not their collaboration with outspoken oppression, discrimination, and protected abuse at a level of sadism. While the oppressed can only leave, they have no means of speaking out under the dictatorship; any call is silenced before it reaches an ear, with a simple and powerful lie – “it’s against women and women’s equality”. After the self-annihilation of what once was the liberal part of society, there will be no memory of the era of dictatorship in the West. It is forbidden to write this history, of what happened in thousands of illegal tribunals in universities, in the work place, in schools, in courts, in hospitals where the chemical and surgical mutilation of tens of thousands of male toddlers and male children to erase their maleness (this falls under the definition of genocide), was conducted by operators of that movement after decades of announcements describing maleness as a disease that must be erased, including “kill all men”, and under the protection of operators of that movement who used their power to forbid, hide, and eliminate objections. And whoever survives the self-annihilation, will want to forget, in order to be able to believe that love, is possible.
Lovism 