“Thousands of years of oppression!” and other feminist myths

Women and girls are kept in complete darkness about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Here is a list of pseudo-facts that are based on disinformation and the corrections. The more women and girls as well as boys and men become aware of them, the better.

“One in three!” Incorrect. 1.4% of women were raped. The data. 

“All women!” Incorrect. 7.2% of women were sexually harassed. The data. 

“Over 90% of male rape victims were raped by men!” Incorrect. 80% of men who were raped were raped by women (most male rape victims were raped in childhood). The data. 

“Married men have longer life expectancy than single men but married women’s life expectancy isn’t longer than single women’s because relationships serve only men!” Incorrect. Women don’t tend to marry sick poor men and sick poor men live less than rich healthy men.

“80% of divorces are initiated by women because men are awful to women!” Incorrect. Feminism encourages women to divorce for any petty reason and has enacted laws that make it in many cases more attractive for some women to divorce than to stay married, while creating laws that would often send a man during divorce to a bench in the park or even to prison, thus women had incentives to initiate divorces and men an opposite incentive to be afraid of initiating it, resulting in the majority of divorces being initiated by women, because of these feminist actions, not because of men.

“All women were property!” Incorrect. Already in ancient Greece divorce was a regular legal procedure, that both sexes could initiate and both were never required to provide any justification. Can “property” decide to divorce and separate? In Greece, after the divorce, the man was required to compensate the woman financially, either by returning a sum given to him by the woman’s family when getting married, or if he couldn’t, by paying the woman an interest derived from that sum, yearly, similarly to what we know today by the name child support and alimony. Does an “owner” compensate financially his “property”? Likewise in Judaism, the man was (and is today) signing a legal contract when marrying, that states a sum he would be giving directly to the woman (not to her family) in case of a divorce. In Judaism as in Greece, the divorce was a legal procedure millennia ago. Women were not “property”, “property” can’t just decide to separate. In Judaism, both sides were required to provide justifications, however, if a man would not accept his wife’s departure, a legal mechanism would be used against him with punishments, to cause him to declare acceptance, and this system indeed created tragedies, but no one can say that women were regarded in ancient societies as “property” – their independence was legalized and protected, to the best of society’s ability in those days. The Catholic church was the largest institution to ban divorce, but it banned it for both sexes, not specifically for women.

“Thousands of years of oppression!” Incorrect. For most of recorded history both sexes were under the oppression of an aristocracy comprised of both sexes (25% of the time, the ruling aristocracy was headed by a queen), and in ordinary households of an agricultural society both sexes worked, outside, in the field. None oppressed the other, but rather, the concept “rights” wasn’t invented until the late 17th century and instead for millennia, human civilizations only formalized nature’s precursor of rights: different and equivalent privileges to each of the two sexes. It’s not that women “didn’t have rights” – they had the female privileges that men didn’t have. Equal rights is better, but the absence of male privileges was never “no rights” – women had the female privileges that men didn’t have (not being sent to war, being compensated financially in divorce even if the woman was from a rich family and the man from a poor one, eligibility for “social security” from the community for livelihood that men were not eligible for, in the form of charity and match-making). Who “had it better”? No one. They both supported each other to survive nature and a ruler, they both suffered together and rejoiced together, they were never in a competition, they had realms and within each, each had status, dignity, significance – all with equivalent value. 

Feminism took over the means of communication. It influences large media platforms and any large online platform and forum. It uses this control to hide from both sexes the falsifications of the disinformation it is spreading. As a result, women and girls adopt completely unfounded beliefs about the society they live in, making millions of them across the world into hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Boys receive long and distorted explanations telling them why granting them what is in fact a status of a sub-human, is only just and moral. All are not receiving information – neither data nor analyses and interpretation of facts can reach them. They are both captives.

It is the responsibility of anyone who has data and explanations to reach out for them when it is possible and share with them data and information. Do your best.